In 1907, William James complains that psychologists have ignored the topic of "the energies of men"—that is, the practical stamina available for "running one's mental and moral operations".
Have good frameworks emerged for this in the past century?
jstor.org/stable/2177575
Conversation
There's "cognitive load", "ego depletion", "self-efficacy", etc… none of these really seem to hit the nail on the head here.
Replying to
"Everyone is familiar with the phenomenon of feeling more or less alive on different days. Everyone knows on any given day that there are energies slumbering in him which the incitements of that day do not call forth, but which he might display if these were greater."
4
2
41
Buddhist writings on dullness ("laya") are a bit closer…
3
9
This was a very interesting overview of work attempting to characterize "mental effort". This article doesn't attempt to explain day-by-day variation, but I may find something like that in the cite tree…
Quote Tweet
Replying to @andy_matuschak
perhaps doesn't hit the nail on the head either (if you're focused on 'energy'), but there are recent lines of work on resource-constrained mental effort and motivation. maybe easiest to trace branches from here? annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114 (non-paywalled: wouterkool.com/papers/Shenhav)
7
Replying to
haven’t seen anything academic but the concept of the energy bucket basically covers it. research into burnout confirms that lack of agency, rest and restoration causes burnout so the opposite does the opposite
read image description
ALT
1
1
Just speaking personally, I notice that while agency, rest, and restoration ensures that I stay well above the burnout line, my James-energies still vary quite a lot within that domain day-to-day.
1
2
Show replies