Many folks (myself included) worry about "pattern matching" in spaced repetition—that they're learning to parrot a response in a narrow context. This experiment tried varying question text to combat that and, surprisingly, got a null result. andymatuschak.org/files/papers/B
Conversation
Worth taking with a grain of salt: the learning scenario here is contrived, may not extend to authentic situations.
I should mention, too, the primary result: retrieval practice appears to effectively support transfer of learning, even to distant contexts.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
No, most of this kind of reading happens in shallower working blocks, often in the late afternoon, unless it's explicitly in the critical path of some creative project.
Replying to
I’ve found that because the context I’m in changes as I review it opens more opportunities for transfer. I.e. being reminded out of context seems to increase transfer.
This is also interesting as time spans increase and I myself am different and need to reintegrate the info.
3
Replying to
my hunch: language so fundamental, & so constantly practiced (even outside drilling), *every* bit of retrieval/talking, even of *other* topics/factoids/words, reinforces 'specific-wording-to-possible-applications' skill. …
1
1
transforming one formulation to equivalent variants as fundamental as breathing, so hard to influence much with simple perturbations.
1


