Steven Pinker's new book, "Rationality", was just released. My impression, 1/4 through, is that it could use a strong dose of "meta-/post-rat" (whatever that means)!
e.g. how do we deal with the nebulosity of "vegetable"? neural nets and weights! sure, in some sense, but…
Conversation
Pleased to see that the book includes quite a concise but clear explainer of causal networks.
1
12
I guess it gets worse.
Quote Tweet
Black person: gets mortgage denied
Pinker: well, was it really racism? or was it simply because the US government, banks, real estate agents and millions of Americans engaged in a multi-decade project of segregation and disinvestment?
Show this thread
1
Honestly, that section of the book was quite sensitively handled. The whole point of it was to underscore how challenging it is to use data without introducing unexpected problems. I don't think the Times's characterization is just.
1
Rather, I don't think the second sentence in the excerpt is just. The first sentence ("blinkered") is perhaps not unreasonable: it's a bit odd to discuss these tensions in the abstract, without at any point referencing the concrete historical instances of redlining.
1
Ugh. The NYTimes is trash. Totally possible I got suckered. 😕
1
Replying to
Just read the full NYT review: it includes very reasonable criticisms of the book's limitations. But like the second sentence in that excerpt, the rhetoric goes beyond the limitations on the page, I feel, in pursuit of culture-war point-scoring. NYT does this a lot these days. :/
Replying to
It’s one thing after another. Just the other day it was pro-cop propaganda. I wrote them off a long time ago, after their coverage of Hillary.
They are very good at presenting a distracting “polite” façade.