Often feels like a contradiction, but I think both a) digital reading is mostly much worse than physical reading; and b) literally translating physical affordances is probably not the right way to make digital reading much better.
Conversation
Right, yes, sure, haptic annotations! Imaginative, at least…
Replying to
A sign of how recursive this field is.... it took me a while to figure out that it is a new pitch and now a transcription of a 1970s Englebart pitch
1
2
"what if there were linear text.... and also a bunch of other graph-based and pile-based stuff to hold non-linear insights about the text"
*sounds of Ted Nelson yelling in the distance*
3