People who haven’t used a memory system tend to think of it as a tool you might apply “when you want to memorize something.” But this misses the point. Without augmentation, explicitly memorizing information is quite onerous, so it's done rarely, for extremely important details.
Conversation
With an efficient memory system, remembering something is a low-stakes decision—a fraction of a minute over years. Such systems wouldn’t be very interesting if you use them only to memorize the kinds of material you already memorize, because people don’t explicitly memorize much.
3
6
43
Not only do memory systems make memory a choice, but they make it an almost costless choice. Emotionally it’s closer to choosing where to highlight or write marginalia on a page. Practically, when an expensive resource becomes ~costless, surprising things happen (eg electricity).
1
7
55
The way I add things to memory systems feels like a *gesture*. It’s usually not that purposeful—more like mentally “underlining." Much like how I use the Twitter like button. Not a bookmark, not a vote, not costly; liking a tweet is a habitual unconscious way I indicate interest.
3
5
70
Based on your previous advice, I was left with the impression that writing good prompts is a very deliberate activity. But here it sounds much more instinctual and less involved. Is this shift in perception just a result of experience and getting accustomed to the techniques?
1
2
Replying to
It's a good question. There's a sort of paradox here! Writing the prompt is often effortful, but the decision to write it is not?
Replying to
Thanks! And, by the way, thank you for openly sharing your work on this topic—I find it incredibly useful and interesting!
2