There's lots of enthusiasm for tools for thought, but one big problem is that efforts often don't meaningfully accrete. In this post I sketch what may be needed to make progress in a ratcheting fashion.
(published patron-only in February; made public now)
Conversation
Replying to
Would you be interested to take a closer look at our work on #MoldableDevelopment? We do materialize it in a technology gtoolkit.com, but the primary goal is to have a vehicle to show and study how we can figure software systems out without reading code. A new practice
1
9
Thanks, Tudor! I watched your Curry On! talk and enjoyed the Smalktalk++ vibes. I look forward to reading / viewing any new reports / talks you all publish. :)
1
3
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Hm, interesting. I guess I don't feel that a missing shared definition is a problem! Is there something in particular (other than the archaic "man") you find outdated in Engelbart's '62 definition?
1
1
5
Show replies