I’m planning to open-source soon—ideally it’s eventually a protocol, not a centralized service! (Once we figure out what “it” is…)
I’m trying to balance benefit to the commons with retaining some privilege/flexibility. Tell me why this licensing plan is a bad idea?
Conversation
I don't understand what 'libraries are provided under apache2' means. Is that binary libraries? source?
1
1
Ah ok so you separate out the libraries from the user-application and cloud-backend license wise?
1
1
Ah sorry i only see the list just now. Makes sense.
1