Conversation

Earnestly/naively curious: what are the best first-principles arguments for why Bitcoin should not end up fully superseded by Ethereum? (Please don’t make me regret asking this! This is a truth-seeking q; I have no dog in this fight)
Quote Tweet
Replying to @BrantlyMillegan
They have completely given up. The narrative now is “hodl,” as if you could ever change the world by sitting on your hands and literally doing nothing.
25
8
124
I think in his recent podcast said that proof of stake (eth 2.0) was potentially open to different class of risks than the btc's pow. I think he might be able to explain it better.
1
Here's the auto-generated part of the youtube transcript. I too wanna learn why proof of stake isn't totally trustless. But tbh I haven't dived much into how it works in first place.
Image
1
2
eth.wiki/concepts/proof “We can solve (1) by making it the user’s responsibility to authenticate the latest state out of band. They can do this by asking their friends, “block explorers, businesses that they interact with, etc. for a recent block hash in the chain. “
1