I’m planning to open-source soon—ideally it’s eventually a protocol, not a centralized service! (Once we figure out what “it” is…)
I’m trying to balance benefit to the commons with retaining some privilege/flexibility. Tell me why this licensing plan is a bad idea?
Conversation
n.b. also that I’ll require contributors to sign a CLA just like Clojure’s, which requires shared copyright (not assignment) and pledges all derivative work will be released under FSF/OSI-approved license
clojure.org/dev/contributo
2
14
(I’ll also have some trademark guidelines to discourage exploitation.)