Conversation

If tutors really do reliably produce two-sigma learning gains, then why aren't most top achievers the product of tutors? Yes, they're expensive, but perhaps "only" 2-3x private school; there are a lot of wealthy parents. Diminishing returns for high achievers?
54
7
279
most top researchers I know effectively had a tutor even if it wasn’t named that eg close academic advisor personally I’ve explicitly had a string of 1-1 ~fulltime mentors going back consistently to when I was 11, although none of them thought they were “tutors”
1
1
40
at least in my case there is a 0% chance anything good I’ve done I could have done without the tutors. If you put them all in a blender you get me, it’s just very easy to see the lineage
1
1
18
Right, I feel similarly. There's a big difference between mentor and tutor though! The former implies much more self-direction, right? … wait, you've had *full-time* mentors since you were 11?! What do you mean by full-time?
1
5
I can’t be super open about it all for legal reasons, but 10-14 I was apprentice to someone who ran a high end web application dev shop, and he guided me basically hourly on how to improve for years. Took embarrassing and free jobs at start but eventually was managing people
2
1
13
Replying to
I’ll dodge the question because there’s been various big shifts in my life over the last 6mo but over the last 2y+ I’ve learned a ton under — far more than I would have alone! I really can’t advocate for tutoring/apprenticeship/etc enough
1
1
2
Show replies