Conversation

Why are different kinds of learning so differently compressible? If I can work through a textbook in 20 1-hour sittings, I usually get similar results from 10 2-hour or 5 4-hour sessions. But piano isn’t that way at all: a 20x1hr piece simply can’t be learned in 5 sessions IME.
21
16
203
One explanation might be that when learning piano pieces, successive sessions rely heavily on previous sessions having been consolidated, whereas many “book-learning” topics are somewhat more breadth-shaped. Another might be that some tasks drain attention faster.
1
31
Other examples of learning which don’t seem to compress very well: – learning how to draw – learning how to design user interfaces – learning how to write Ones which seem to compress well: – learning how to cook – learning a new programming language – learning a spoken language
15
5
58
Replying to
Thanks for the link! I stumbled across a pdf of this ages ago, it was very useful then but it got probably stuck in an old hard drive or smth. Now I’m back practicing again so this will be of great benefit!
Replying to
The brain builds models for each new skill it acquires. The level of challenge depends on wether the model extends previously learned skills or has to be built from scratch. Experienced musicians, can learn to play the piano much faster and easier than those lacking prior skills.