Conversation

A possible solution might be to have third option for the prompts where you get to read them (and the relevant text-passage!) every few days until the wording + abstractions have sunken in / synchronized with your own inner world.
2
2
Sure, that is the "normal" SRS-part. But it probably does not work for prompts that you cant get right at all / refuse to put in the effort to get right? I need to look into it. I feel like I want the agency to refuse to undertand right now (which I take for granted with text).
2
1
I'm super grateful for this very thoughtful feedback, Lucca. Writing lots of notes about this! Smooth-brain wondering: to what extent do you think it would it help if the prompts in question were shoved to later in the article after you'd had time to absorb their use a bit more?
1
Love to help, I want to see Orbit succeed! Moving them to a later point could help in some cases, but I dont think it solves the general problem of complex ideas sometimes just taking a lot of time to sink in.
1
1
Maybe the area of inquiry can be described as: How do SRS-essays deal with necessary re-reading? Prompts as possible stopping-points.
1
1
Even if the prompts have already been created I dont see why this approach wouldnt still be necessary for complex topics.
1
A possible solution would to have conditional or hierarchical prompts that only appear once a certain repetition level has been reached. See:
Quote Tweet
Its obvious that learning is sequence-dependant. As they say "you cant run before you walk". Still, there is now easy way to sequence flashcards. This is a missing primitive.
Show this thread
1
1
Or another framing: the open question is the scheduling when to show prompts the first time vs the general scheduling of prompts. I feel like this is a time-axis that is mostly unexplored.
3
1