Have you run across any themes or novel solutions in how they’re thinking about the financing model?
Conversation
Independent researchers should import models from the Cal Newport's career capital framework in these discussions (80000hours.org/key-ideas/#car). Academia is imperfect, but offers a path to acquiring more career capital over time & obtaining more autonomy.
1
3
So what types of career capital waves & trajectories need to be thought about for independent research? I think did a great job here IMO, by building towards her more ambitious research idea over time (but starting with the Ford grant).
1
1
I don't think funding alone is the challenge. Even if you secure initial funding, you still have to have a clear story of value to your funders and how you've increased that 'value' to get more. Traditionally that was publishing papers in competitive journals, what replaces that?
1
3
Overstating slightly: Sometimes I wonder whether "independent research" is an oxymoron. Funding always comes from someone.
2
1
5
If research has an audience willing to pay for *output*, then you have customers. I'm not convinced most real research with customers to please is possible in most domains.
1
1
1
If you have an audience willing to pay for your *input* (necessary for the uncertainty and timescale of real research), then you have sponsors. Those sponsors have some goals for their investment and administering your funding requires some infrastructure.
1
1
1
Of course the specificity of sponsors' goals and their alignment with your own may vary, but at that point it seems like you've recapitulated some sort of "non-independent" structure.
1
A couple extremes which might be exceptions to this include (a) content creation monetized across a large audience, and (b) internal/external consulting with a skillset core to your research.
2
1
1
If the profitable work of (a + b) can take < 10–20h/w of work, I can perhaps imagine enough bandwidth for real research. But I'm not sure how big that market is or how widely applicable across domains.
1
1
One boundary-condition route which seems relevant: many folks could work as an sweng for Google for ~5–10 years, then simply fund their own work indefinitely thereafter. A stable version of "drawing down savings for a few years."
But I suspect that even in this ideal-seeming case with funding taken care of, the work would often naturally evolve to something more institutional: a "center," an "institute," a startup, etc—simply as an avenue for greater impact/insight. See also:
Quote Tweet
I was briefly calling myself an independent researcher: somebody who self-funds spec R&D on their own ideas. In theory it’s something like indie-research : academic research :: blogging/self-publishing : traditional publishing.
But the idea doesn’t really work.
Show this thread
2
3
That seems right! Do you have a rough guess as to what % of Google engineers could do that? Saving 200–400K/y to endow $100K in consumption over 5–10y is certainly doable, but I don't have a sense if that's 1% or 10% (or more) of engineers' compensation.
1
Show replies