They had a very interesting postmortem, as it happens:
Conversation
Amusingly, I disagree with the founder! He clashed w Eliezer, who wanted to focus on specific content, do special-case stuff, perfect that. Alexei thinks they should have focused on getting more authors. Premature in my view: prove in the high-effort case, then generalize.
1
3
It’s sad: in the end, we’re left with no clear insight about what the best-case problems were with that core idea of surfacing and navigating dependency chains.
2
3
I’m reading it now… thank you, extremely interesting, and discouraging.
Given your bearishness on the whole space, I’m wondering why you have built, and are actively using, one yourself?
1
1
My goals are very different. My writing system is about helping me think, not about creating a legible communications artifact. The challenges are quite different across the two domains! The classic hypertext problems aren’t so limiting in a writing-focused context.
1
4
I put my notes online almost as an afterthought. I’m frankly quite surprised that many people seem to enjoy reading them! I hate navigating that kind of atomized hypertext someone else has written. e.g. I haven’t yet come across a public Roam I enjoy reading.
2
10
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This is kind; thank you Brian!

