Conversation

Curious about "topics the internet left behind," where there's tons of deep knowledge in old books, but most everything online's shallow & Yahoo Answers-like. Serious piano practice technique is a good example; culinary composition is another. Why do some topics end up that way?
44
25
384
Replying to
Off the cuff, I think old-school gems aren't online because the information is being passed down through apprenticeship, ie books/oral trad. in private study/ conservatory. I spent years self-taught before I met someone who referred me to Jozsef Gat's out-of-print piano tech book
1
1
1
(Gat taught piano at the Liszt Academy in Budapest.) Basically, great info is still hidden in the minds and studios of the modern-day masters, and the sense of needing to share online doesn't impact them directly, in part b/c they're so busy teaching current students!
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
On this example, I imagine model complexity of the skill causes a great divergence in approaches to and vocabularies around the topic. Topics where everyone forms their own ad hoc syllabus, not something polished, accessibly structured or easily documentable
1
1
Replying to
It's interesting to me that you use piano practice as an example. Given the difficulty of describing what to do via print, I've thought of video as a much better medium for exactly this! There are thorough discussions by Graham Fitch and John Mortensen that I've found very useful
1
Show replies