So interesting comparing pages in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy vs Wikipedia analogues: plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics vs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontolog.
SEP is consistently clearer—I think bc of the narrative form. Are there other domain-specific, expert-edited wikis like SEP?
Conversation
obsessed with that site!
Quote Tweet
Replying to @smc90
This is a must-read piece, not just on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy but how online knowledge constructed bit.ly/1POn8xi
1
1
3
and also consider it to be a form of (my favorite topic theme etc.!) *world building*
Quote Tweet
oh btw I would argue Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is also a form of world-building -- ea of those philosophers occupied specific worlds; are characters that traveled across time/place inspiring ea other thru their works; and it's all laid out there!
twitter.com/smc90/status/6
2
1
7
Sonal I feel myself being sucked into a very dangerous rabbit hole here.
1
4
I've got threads upon threads on the theme (and a newsletter too)
Quote Tweet
Everything in content strategy for me boils down to just these 2 words: WORLD BUILDING twitter.com/smc90/status/1
Show this thread
1
1
3
Quote Tweet
I'm finally playing with the Disney+ interface and the thing that strikes me most (besides its obvious similar interface to Netflix) is its *world-building*
Show this thread
1
1
3
and others! but you will appreciate this one as it's in context of education/ how people learn:
Quote Tweet
[I thought then, and now think more often -- in context of current world-building focus/obsession -- that story is the stitch and seam, where the "building" happens in one's head regardless]
Show this thread
2
1
1
Replying to
💪 yess Vygotsky~~! Thank you for deepening the rabbit hole.
If by chance you haven’t seen it, Design Unbound by and presents a fascinating treatment of worldbuilding in the context of system design.