maybe i should make an 'application'
Conversation
i feel like archetypal 'applications' are, like, Photoshop, or AutoCAD, or Mathematica, or Excel, or Blender, or GIS software. as opposed to 'apps' or 'products'
2
18
an application as a kind of home u can live in for its domain
often a lot of panels and toolbars and menus and stuff orbiting around a central planet, the view of the object you're creating -- the document or map or 3D model or whatever
1
19
"Introducing a new [programming] language doesn't work… but people will embrace what looks like a useful new application in itself." books.google.com/books?id=0drDR
read image description
ALT
1
14
48
2
2
When we hear archetypal 'applications', it instantly sparks 'monolithic' in our minds, and this is definitely something we're actually trying to get away from at the moment.
Here's explained it really clearly:
See: "Simple decoding and playback"
nopenopenope.net/posts/audio
1
4
10
That's a fun doc, thanks! Would you sum it up as some variant on "unix philosophy"?
2
Another example is the screencapture pipeline in plan9, since the screen itself is a file, it can be cat into other things and read through.
wiki.xxiivv.com/site/plan9.html
1
2
8



