Conversation

Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
Notion deserves credit for a lot too, especially with respect to UI --
@ccorcos
deserves much more credit than Notion though, because project that got him job at Notion (markdown parser that allowed arbitrary React components) solved HUGE bottleneck 4 us.
Quote Tweet
Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
Β·
For years I've been working on a Doug Engelbart style "Dynamic Knowledge Repository" @NotionHQ beat me to it. Try it notion.so/invite/twitter
1
4
Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
Just the idea of it. Whether or not code was open source was totally irrelevant. Had 10 minute conversation with him about the side project, with a few days, got up in middle of night and built {{[[TODO]]}} and {{[[DONE}}, which opened door for {{diagram}} and {{table}}.
1
3
Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
Fact that you could combine single markdown escape hatch for arbitrary display / interactivity - from
@ccorcos
And STILL build off all the filter and backlinks power Roam already had... That was the novel insight Chet inspired {{todo}} Rich hickey inspired {{[[TODO]]}}
1
6
Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
So much of the hard work in design comes with figuring out details of the workflow and conceptual model - often only by months of working with users. Open sourcing actual code for consumer tools is red herring, ignores other contributions to commons
Quote Tweet
Conor White-Sullivan πƒπŸ”πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@Conaw
Β·
Replying to @mekarpeles @RoamResearch and @AthensResearch
Open source was totally irrelevant - at least for me. Never needed to read your code, definitely was never going to use. What mattered was you pushed the conceptual frontier.
2
9
Mek
@mekarpeles
I agree there are many valuable forms of contribution: One not needing a resource is not grounds for justifying it be closed. The world is built on resources I, in my privileged position, don't need and which others do. All things equal; show work, share, & enable.
1
Andy Matuschak
@andy_matuschak
I sympathize with Conor hereβ€”it's already so hard to get a tool like this off the ground; adding more constraints (i.e. on production flywheel) seems like asking for trouble. I love that we've found some models that work (e.g. open core); I'd love to see a playbook collection.
1
13
Andy Matuschak
@andy_matuschak
I struggle with this in my own work. It's obvious that if it's to succeed in the long term, Orbit wants to be an open standard with OSS implementations. But it's also obvious that there are enormous path dependencies; it's not at all clear when and how it's best to move to open.
1
9
Andy Matuschak
@andy_matuschak
My current inclination is to rapidly publish sources under restrictive "source available" licenses, then slowly move modules to open licenses from the bottom of the stack upwards as I better understand my path to sustainability. But who knows…
2
9
Andy Matuschak
@andy_matuschak
I don't understand what you mean. Maybe you're suggesting that because the interaction with users helps produce the key insights, they should be co-owners? I'm mildly sympathetic to this view, but it seems like a very low-order bit.
1
Show replies