Curious: for those of you have worked at orgs which use the concept of Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI), how well has it worked? What's been good? Bad? Other?
A thoughtful old article from : quora.com/Apple-company/
Conversation
It was an essential mechanism for abstraction at Apple: many people work on many projects; you need a single point of contact and responsibility. Hard to compose many projects without—contact us too diffuse. KA tried a finer-grained model, but it often just confused things.
1
27
It’s more appropriate for bounded, execution-oriented work, rather than open-ended creative work. In the latter context concentrating ownership can be premature; can discourage surprising ideas from individuals during generative phases.
Quote Tweet
1
1
7
every single discussion of OKRs should start with this quote. , what say you?
3
Agreed. DRIs were a means to assign responsibility and authority as a package once it had been decided we wanted a specific project accomplished in a given time frame. It makes less sense to have a DRI for an ill-defined thing that doesn’t have a ship date.
1
2
10
Actually I think your story about the invention of the iOS keyboard is a great example here. During the great keyboard bake-off, there was no DRI; everyone’s trying to figure out a model. But then yours won, and it become plan of record, and then you’re keyboard DRI.
1
9
Show replies
Building on Herbert Simon’s Sciences of the Artificial, I have a paper outlining a similar distinction.
“Opportunities as Artifacts and Entrepreneurship as Design”.
henrikberglund.com/Berglund%2C%20
