Conversation

It's one thing I like about spaced repetition as a mechanism. Say that you’d like to study cell metabolism. Without SRS, you need to make a plan ("I study cell biology on Tuesday"), set up some trigger to help you remember the plan, and summon the will to execute it repeatedly.
1
4
21
But if you have an active SRS practice, you can throw some prompts into your library and be confident that you’ll engage over time. You don’t need to decide how often you’ll study or to exert willpower to study those particular prompts—only to show up for daily SRS practice.
1
4
24
I have an inbox thing I'm working on here myself trying to figure this out. Can you make an inbox "wu wei"... Super great search and "snooze" seem helpful?
2
1
Yes!! I think the “almost SRS” here is important. The “maybe 1 day later”. I’m working on a snooze mechanism that has an rng element to it. I’m not trying to “remember” the content the same way as when I use Anki, but I really want to avoid loss aversion!
1
Replying to
Totally. Like an increasing rng snooze. I explored the idea of “decay” a bit too, and “rot” where something would rot more the more you snoozed it. But I’m landing on not actually indicating how many times you’ve snoozed a thing, it just spaces it out further (with rng)
1
1
Complice has an interesting interaction here: if you specify an intention, then don't do it, then pull it into the next day's intentions, then don't do it, then pull it into the next day's list *again*, it prompts: ~"Write a note to yourself about why today will be different."
1
3
Show replies