Conversation

Replying to
This may be mostly about a difference in style of work. Or maybe it's just a sign of fogeyism. I feel more in love with live, synchronous SF "Global Weird HQ" culture than ever! I'm throwing wistful paper airplane love letters to it from up in a high castle! 👋
2
1
32
It's likely more a sign of my own failings than anything else, but I've never been able to make deeply generative collaborations work remotely. Tried many models with many people! Procedural, separable work: sure! But with generative work, best I've seen is "bad but tolerable."
1
25
I'd love to learn from successes here! I've read many articles, threads, stories on remote collaboration practices, but almost exclusively with a frame of execution and operations, separable tasks and skillsets. I'd love to read stories of ideation, invention, free jazz, etc.
1
20
Oddly, one of the best models I have here is old-school correspondence. People working mostly independently on creative projects, sending each other long letters (emails) every few months with distilled thoughts and wonderings. A different kind of collaboration, but quite good.
6
2
47
Replying to
Human contact and face-to-face interaction will always remain important, but having to relocate for a job or commute hours every day to get to work should be a thing of the past. Remote working is here to stay. Those that don’t embrace it will end up losing the best talent.
1
4
Replying to
Yes, it looks like variable time spent at the office is the best. Team bonding and certain project stages require in-person interaction. At other times WFH wins due to convenience. But full remote work is the more likely outcome.
1
1
Replying to
I think feelings like this might be more a side-effect of having to go fully-remote so quickly. I've been 100% remote for over 5 years and the first few months had their challenges but I ended up preferring it to in-office work.
1