The hardware is solid. Good materials; light; good industrial design; decent battery. The stylus is fine. The inking is tolerable. The software's pretty miserable. A new model is shipping this summer, but apparently with the same software—which is where the problems are.
-
Show this thread
-
The main issue is that the device doesn't take itself seriously as either a digital reader or a digital notebook, at the book level. It takes the micro, page level quite seriously. One-page sketching, drafting, etc—that's all fine. But the levels above that are basically absent.
1 reply 0 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
If you sketch or hand-write ideas across dozens of pages, good luck finding or arranging them or doing basically anything with them after the fact. Few real affordances. It's the same with reading—the fixation is on the single page you're looking at. Everything else is onerous.
2 replies 0 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
Stepping up a level from that, to a broader professional workflow, it's extremely unserious. A device like this doesn't exist in isolation—it wants to ingest documents from some living source and produce work to be consumed by other tools. It's truly awful at this.
1 reply 1 retweet 34 likesShow this thread -
The Kindle is also bad at all these things. Kindle has *slightly* better high-level affordances as an e-reader. But what makes the reMarkable *so much* better than the Kindle is that you can read books—in their original layout—as PDFs (which is good bc rM's EPUB reader is awful).
1 reply 0 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Here's that photo again. This is the actual, professionally-typeset page from the original print edition! I can write in the margins! In fact, the margin's bigger than in the print book (& I can make it bigger)! EPUBs are a terrible reading experience. Give me typesetting!pic.twitter.com/1gFtuNFP3z
6 replies 0 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
Since the hardware's solid, perhaps the software flaws will improve. They sure have more velocity than the Kindle! But beyond the flaws, the real bummer for me is a deep lack of imagination in the software design. It takes the metaphor too literally. It so just wants to be paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
But this thing's *not* paper! In a 2014 meeting on the iOS redesign, Jony said (paraphrasing): "Why put pictures of screws attaching that button to its housing? It's made of pixels! It's not going to fall off! We can do whatever we want!" rM forgets that it's made of pixels.
4 replies 2 retweets 80 likesShow this thread -
So, but anyway: the high order bit is that you can have a stack of books and your nice notebook, in the sand/dirt/etc, without squinting hopelessly at an LCD. Not many other options for that! Working outside is wonderful.
5 replies 0 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @andy_matuschak
Have you tried Sony Digital Paper? A friend of mine has used both, and ended up staying with Sony. https://www.sony.com/electronics/digital-paper-systems/t/digital-paper-notepad …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Took a look, and the software also looked quite poor. The key difference to me was that rM's (partially) open source, and I can fix the worst of its workflow problems myself.
-
-
Replying to @andy_matuschak
Good point! This will hopefully help software improve quicker over time
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.