Imagine having as an assignment: "Summarize this article", "Which evergreen notes would you extract", "How would you connect these ideas". Of course will always be artificial, but would lead to great discussions and leveling up.
My concern is similar but slightly different. Not just: "I don't understand these ideas enough" but "*no one* understands these ideas enough" (to enable transformative impact)—i.e. there is no "Nobel-level" teacher, only high school math teachers (and people fooling themselves).
-
-
And to add: shouldn’t we also accept that note-taking is so personal and contextual past the professional/disciplinary context that it is not about “note-taking” but external thinking - and therefore infinitely variable?
-
I don’t teach my students how to take-notes, I am to instruct/demonstrate thinking and sense-making.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Gotta work on my papers first