Conversation

This movement has very little to nothing of the religious in it... it lacks religion's core function: "relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, or spiritual elements." It is for precisely this reason that we cannot imagine any of its hymns.
2
1
13
This is not meant to disparage the work itself: I stand behind it wholeheartedly!! But there is very little religious function here.
1
1
If we're speaking of something akin to Spirit in the Hegelian sense? The existence of a voracious, irreducible thing in each of us? Indubitably.
1
1
3
It's a challenging conversation for Twitter (and I'm frankly not very good at this medium) -- but I really appreciate your voicing anything "religious" out loud, and don't mean to disparage it.
1
1
2
Yah he's a bitch but we use what we have. I don't think Spirit is something we can talk about directly? That seems to be something inherent to it. It's embarrassing and frustrating to be circular, but circularity may be the best we have.
1
2