One way to look at memory systems' efficiency is marginal cost: I can choose to "pay" 5m over my lifetime to memorize the answer to a question. I find it generative to flip that around. Say I saturated 10 minutes of review daily—what would that casual practice unlock? (thread)
-
Show this thread
-
This framing maps better onto my lived experience. I review during interstitial dead time I'd probably misuse. It doesn't "cost" 10 minutes: it's free, so long as it stays in that timebox. Empirically, I find my reviews stay <10 minutes so long as I cap new questions to 40/day.
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
If I could add 40 questions a day, that would mean I could add 14,600 questions a year, at the cost of 10 minutes a day! The first chapter of Quantum Country is 112 questions, so that amount to something like memorizing the material from 130 textbook chapters!
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
But I don't add 40 questions a day! Question-writing, not reviewing, is the real bottleneck for my practice. It's awfully difficult to write good questions, and taxing even if you're skilled at it. I find it also requires a significant context switch.
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @andy_matuschak
I remember reading about research that understanding a fact with difficulty leads to better retention, vs if it were easily understood. So that upper limit might be good in the long run vs. just writing more questions if that came with ease.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, it's an essential tension here. I don't think I'm near the efficient frontier, though—the mnemonic medium already makes that pretty clear.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.