But I don't add 40 questions a day! Question-writing, not reviewing, is the real bottleneck for my practice.
It's awfully difficult to write good questions, and taxing even if you're skilled at it. I find it also requires a significant context switch.
Conversation
Of course, lots of people solve this by downloading others' questions, but this seems to rarely work outside basic language learning. Instead, it usually leads to people dropping the practice. More on why:
1
15
Enter: the mnemonic medium. By interleaving expert-authored prompts with prose narrative, authors embed those prompts in structure with meaning. notes.andymatuschak.org/z5YjgWTaYfhWLr
Authors supply the prompts, lightening readers' burden.
2
1
28
There's some tension here. If I made my own 112 prompts for the first chapter of QC, I'd likely get a much deeper understanding of the material. But—also—I probably wouldn't do it! I want to spend that effort on material core to my creative work, less on more peripheral material.
1
13
The first chapter of QC takes most readers 4 hours to read (and has 112 questions). I spend 1-2 hours a day reading. So if the mnemonic medium were ubiquitous, I'd end up adding 40 questions a day, no sweat. That seems awfully enticing!
1
11
The mnemonic medium is a long way from ubiquity, to put it mildly. In the meantime, I've significantly increased my rate of new SRS prompts with another approach: turning my daily writing practice into a kind of *personal* mnemonic medium.
2
1
9
I write for a few hours each day, accumulating notes like the ones you see in this thread. They really help me think. notes.andymatuschak.org/zVFGpprS64TzmK
But as I write prose about those topics, I also write SRS questions inline, much like the mnemonic medium.
2
1
27
Those embedded questions end up in my daily review practice. I find that it's easier to write a lot of them this way, in the context of writing prose. Particularly cloze deletions.
The practice feels quite strange! It certainly distorts the prose… but not always harmfully?
2
11
One thing I like about this approach is: I don't want to just remember things I read—I want SRS to help me develop new ideas! I want to regularly review all the fragmentary inklings I sketch on the way to new insights. Embedded prompts are a convenient way to make that happen.
4
1
21
I feel I don't yet understand the personal mnemonic medium at all: I've only been writing this style of note for about a month. It's different from the mnemonic medium, and it's different from my old note medium, which is itself idiosyncratically different from normal notes.
1
1
15
I do notice that my 40 question/day quota is more consistently saturated with this practice, and that may be the high-order bit!
And of course, if review sessions are sufficiently valuable, that cap will grow: people will happily spend more than 10 minutes per day.
Hallo you can read it here: : One way to look at memory systems' efficiency is marginal cost: I can choose to "pay" 5m over my… threadreaderapp.com/thread/1244842 Enjoy :) 🤖
2
Replying to
What do you base this 40 questions on, just material that you are reading/writing/thinking about?
How often do you go back to answer and study does 40 questions?
Any specific goal?
40 questions a day seem like a lot, 1200 Qs a month seem hard to practice to
more on this?
1
This is in the context of a spaced repetition memory practice, in which 1200 q's is actually quite cheap. See augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html and numinous.productions/ttft/ for background.
3