Agree here too
iPads arent computers
iOS isn't an empoweding OS
MercuryOS is a good conceptual framework for **something** related to (programmable attention)TM-
Conversation
My broad sense is that the desired end-state is an inversion, a dual of the current structure: instead of apps-as-nodes, we have apps-as-edges. Roam and LiquidText are nouns/places; I think their ideal form is as verb. Roam/etc-as-OS is roughly what’s necessary for this, I think.
2
2
9
We've tinkered with "apps as service providers" (not in those terms, of course) before. Plan9 took it pretty far down into the Mach kernel, even. It has some useful bits but the multiplicity of desired ways to touch ANYTHING means things get unpredictable fast.
1
2
3
Indeed. I don’t know a workable model for this.
It’s interesting to see TimBL try it again with Solid.
The “no-code”/“Zapier-driven” trend is interesting to watch, too, since there’s a greater emphasis on end-user-usability. But I’m not optimistic here.
1
3
Maybe there's not a workable model -- at least while maintaining continuity with current workspaces and actual work getting done.
The idea of externally-hooking pipes is probably the best possibility but dealing with API limitations will hurt them, always.
1
Sooner or later, it BECOMES code, even if it's dragging lines and connecting pipes with filters and transformers and not writing text.
2
2
Yes, and then it devolves to solving the end-user programming problem, which AFAICT we’ve not made much progress on in decades.
The more interesting question may be how to move the 80/20 line, and I do think some of the no-code projects have made useful progress there.
1
1
Looking into things like Blender and other video compositing/FX systems that use box-and-pipe abstractions for building complex systems, or things like Blueprints in Unreal (game engine), there's been a _lot_ of that progress.
1
1
Yes, Blueprint is amazing. It’s telling that there are full-time employees who use it exclusively, all day, as their primary environment—but who cannot “code” in a traditional sense.
1
2
I'd say they code all day, every day, but I've never been of the "ascended priesthood" class of programmer. Programming is the detailed specification of intent to a machine; the symbols used are immaterial. Machinists "code" both digital and analog computers to produce pieces.
1
I agree, of course, was using “code” ironically there.