We’ve been iterating on review schedules and mechanisms on Quantum Country.
Discovered this morning: hitting 5 days of retention across the whole first essay used to take the median user 11 review sessions… now it takes 5! (And readers called it a good “bang-for-buck” before!)
Conversation
(Lots of caveats here: so many variables have changed that it’s hard to make a direct comparison. But this signal’s so strong that it seems awfully encouraging anyway!)
Replying to
I was going through it (got to the Hadamard transform) and thought that having pictures representing the operations as rotations, with explicit pictures (eg physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3139 ) makes it easier to understand (Same happens to be with any algebra thing)
1
1
Though idk if this is true for everyone. Was there a thought process behind not using the rotation analogue? A section later on discusses it.
1
1
Show replies
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
That's a helpful data point—thank you! If I can trouble you: did you feel like you could remember answers to questions in the review sessions, but that you didn't really understand them? Or did you pause reading QC until you'd looked at other material? (which material?)