We’ve been iterating on review schedules and mechanisms on Quantum Country. Discovered this morning: hitting 5 days of retention across the whole first essay used to take the median user 11 review sessions… now it takes 5! (And readers called it a good “bang-for-buck” before!)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's a helpful data point—thank you! If I can trouble you: did you feel like you could remember answers to questions in the review sessions, but that you didn't really understand them? Or did you pause reading QC until you'd looked at other material? (which material?)
End of conversation
-
-
-
I was going through it (got to the Hadamard transform) and thought that having pictures representing the operations as rotations, with explicit pictures (eg https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/313959/visual-interpretation-on-the-bloch-sphere-when-hadamard-gate-is-applied-twice … ) makes it easier to understand (Same happens to be with any algebra thing)
-
Though idk if this is true for everyone. Was there a thought process behind not using the rotation analogue? A section later on discusses it.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Would love to work out what are the key variables
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.