Conversation

Modern design practice demands deep engagement with users' context: interviewing, embedding, reading, empathizing. Such a powerful discipline… yet it's hard to shake the sense that the people creating profound tools for thought are doing all those things—somehow way more deeply.
1
2
41
On a personal level, that idea was the emotional core of the piece for me. I've really struggled with my relationship to design. I've felt enthralled and empowered by its remarkable practices, but also instinctively uneasy that the work I most admire seems subtly "apart" from it.
Image
2
5
51
Developing this piece with has helped me tentatively resolve that tension: it's a yes-and. This was a huge relief! I saw that the practices were somehow limited—but they were too predictive to write off, and I couldn't see how to subsume them.
Image
4
4
37
Good but not enough. Book is a nice format if we can put emotion into reading them. Also, what happens if you forget what you read? You lose precious time by repeating retrieval steps.
2
We’re building a platform that harnesses greed to empower curiosity: medium.com/@harmonylion1/ The first goal is to give the public an alternative to corporate narrative control—ultimately, it builds a more mature epistemology into society’s knowledge infrastructure. 😊
8
Funny enough, Story of Your Life has been a huge recurring theme in our discussions over the last few months. I didn’t expect that to have manifested in the essay! What made you ask?
1
10
Show replies