Conversation

Knowledge media face an awkward chasm between theories. The old theory was naive transmissionism: "I'll convey this knowledge by telling you about it." That's effectively books' learning model. But we know that model's wrong: learning is an active process of assimilation.
5
21
89
Books (and videos and lectures) sometimes work anyway, but because the learner's doing the heavy lifting—making connections, posing & answering questions, etc In apprenticeships and great classrooms, the new theory (constructivism) operates: teachers foster active assimilation.
2
3
49
But what's the equivalent of a "book" which was composed using an effective theory of how its reader will learn? We don't know. It's a rock and a hard place: we know the old theory's wrong; we don't know how to make media which operate under our new theories. Exciting times.
19
11
80
Look at ToC of multiple sources, sort by year, try to pick the most recent, most comprehensive, and most principled (subjective). Then I study it in sequence. Getting hands-on with the subject can be a bit delayed sometimes.
2
1
I know these questions feel endless, so feel free to beg out at any time, but I'll continue collecting data until then. :) Can you describe your note-taking practices? What is a "good" note to you? How do you balance granular vs. syntopic? Any specific principles you use?
1
Show replies