Recently gave me the tiniest of glimpses into the world of competitive policy debate and oh wow I am still a naive idiot about this subculture but I am SO! FASCINATED!
First! Some of them make arguments at ~six trillion WPM?? Please listen:
Conversation
These arguments draw on huge libraries of cards which they prepare in advance, individually summarizing various speeches, policy documents, positions, etc! Teams use these plastic tubs to transport these papers b/c they maximize checked baggage volume! nytimes.com/2010/04/18/edu
1
4
They "cut" 1000s of these cards by using a multi-level scale of underlining, bolding, highlighting, font size, etc to make the key points of a primary source rapidly visible on the page! There are plugins for word processors to help do this more quickly! chrome.google.com/webstore/detai
1
1
6
The highlighting technique makes me wonder whether some of How to Read a Book's approach could be executed this way, surfacing the text's structural skeleton through levels of inline markup, rather than by making a parallel summarizing outline. I'll need to try these plugins!
1
11
Also: any claims one team makes which aren't specifically refuted by the opposing team are taken to be true! The fast-talkers are fast-talking to make as many claims as possible—and the opposing team has to track and then refute each one!
Replying to
I still don't understand anything that's going on when I watch one of these things, but I'm totally fascinated and impressed! (And my apologies, , for my inevitable butchery of what you described)
2
10
Replying to
lol it seems like they missed adding a rule somewhere, the format got hacked, and now that's how it going to be forever
1
Replying to
yeah this is the heart of it, right? I wonder how the debates mutated over time to arrive at their current state.
Decades ago was this rule just a minor tiebreak-like thing? Then came years of controversy over dishonorably using the rule? Then acceptance and optimization?
1