Conversation

Indeed! Per Kay: perhaps we should instead be optimizing “number of Sistine Chapel ceilings per generation.” vpri.org/pdf/hc_pers_co
Quote Tweet
Replying to @dela3499 and @andy_matuschak
I get the impression that self-directed learning is tested by the perverse question: “When students are free to be different and learn what they like how they like, do they nevertheless turn out the same, and learn precisely and only what I want them to know - efficiently?”
1
12
Are you implying that the Sistine Chapel ceiling is an exemplar of self-directed work? If so, I’m not sure that’s right. Pope Julius II coerced Michelangelo to do the painting. The artist himself would have much rather kept to his sculpture.
2
No, Kay argues that we should choose goals which emphasize leaps of beauty and insight over, say, proficiency with a set of standard skills. So: is it possible that student-directed methods support the former but are judged by the latter?
2
I get your point. Yet, fresco painting is a difficult skill, and without proficiency in it, leaps of beauty and insight in that medium are not possible. So, a question: is it possible to make skill acquisition joyful?
2