Digital ink is so much more expressive than the impoverished "highlight / add note" interactions available in all e-readers. Many let you draw on documents (though not books), but I've never seen any connect those scribbles meaningfully to the underlying text.
-
-
Show this thread
-
At work, we've already used this kind of ink markup in two neat ways: 1. Annotating quoted text inline with connections to the quoting document's line of reasoning (can't share example unfortunately). 2. Deliberately lo-fi metacommentary layer (e.g. see image)pic.twitter.com/cbbYH8Ucec
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pretty cool. My only question is the most basic. How does the range of string for say dynamic discipline know it’s right if dynamic discipline is in the string multiple times. Other than that I think I get how all of this works and yes it is a cool feature
-
I expect it anchors to index ranges and defines mutations which preserves those anchors, as opposed to anchoring to matched substrings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I see the quote in the gif is very relevant, even if hard to read while it’s being edited.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Wow!