andrew.kimmel@gmail.com
Interesting take.pic.twitter.com/vYY7UFWlTt
-
They have a good point.
What’s the point? That a flight going to a destination with or without me on it is hypocritical of my approval of a GND? Give me a break. If I chartered the plane, of course.
-
-
If all the climate fanatics truly believed we’re in a climate crisis & need to take immediate action, they wouldn’t continue supporting airlines with abysmal carbon footprints Nevertheless, your Mexico story was one of the best travel threads in a whilehttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2019/1/11/18177118/airlines-climate-change-emissions-travel …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They do have a point. If you (or anyone else) stopped flying there the airline wouldn't create flights for it. It's a bit hypocritical, and I'm all for the GND.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your weight added to the fuel used, round trip. Maybe go down to the beach this weekend to pick up straws. That might offset your contribution to the destruction of the planet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am convinced if climate alarmists really believed what they were saying we would see them on episodes of Doomsday Preppers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's a silly argument. It's like somebody saying he doesn't want to kill animals for food, but the meat in the stores is from animals that are already dead, so...
-
lol what - not it's not. the whole thread is about much he's used the airliner and took this flight to maintain his status. I guess that car that he rented was going to be used by someone so it might as well been used by him
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.