andrew.kimmel@gmail.com
It's not the TIME Poll but still, I think Hong Kong protesters should have been POTY Apparently around 250,000 other people agree But POTY is an editorial choicepic.twitter.com/rSE91mGPWB
-
Yes it says it in the first sentence of the tweet
Then what is the point of the tweet? It’s like taking a Breitbart poll and saying Trump clearly should’ve been Time’s POTY.
-
-
Thunberg also lost the TIME poll and came in 5th place in voting whereas Hong kong came in 1st w over 30% of the vote so the sentiment remains the same that Greta did not deserve it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wooooooosh over the head *winces*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The point is to show that people want the HK protestors to win POTY, but it's too bad that they won't be picked as it's an editorial choice.
-
dont event boyher him man hes just dont wanna admit the fact by twisting the tweet left and right smh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Usually you'd be right, it wouldn't be relevant at all but seeing as though Time themselves who don't release the exact results like the poll above said that Hong Kong protestors won and all climate activists together got less than 4.5% of the vote but still picked Greta anyway.pic.twitter.com/FetAMKuDYk
-
The point is how is someone who came in 5th on the top voting list, voted by the people somehow the most influential. You'd expect the person/group who mobalised the most voters had the most influence. For more context HK protestors got over 30% of vote, Greta got <4%.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The point is saying the HK protestors should be POTY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.