HAPPENING NOW: @SenBooker escorts victims of abuse seeking asylum across the Santa Fe bridge from Juárez, Mexico to El Paso, TX. The asylum seekers were sent back to Mexico under the MPP program. They have asked for their identities to be protected. @CoryBookerpic.twitter.com/FKXcIZAmHC
-
Show this thread
-
The senator spent 4+ hours speaking w/ the asylum seekers at the Organización Internacional Para Las Migraciones (OIM) in Juárez prior to the border crossing. The action comes following the campaign’s statement to end the border crisis. https://corybooker.com/issues/immigration/policy-page/ …pic.twitter.com/t0AllW6d8B
74 replies 123 retweets 461 likesShow this thread -
Why protest the MPP? As part of the UN Convention against Torture & Other Cruel/Inhuman/Degrading Treatment/Punishment, the US is obligated not to return anyone “where there are substantial grounds for believing that [they] would be in danger of being subjected to torture.”
26 replies 73 retweets 284 likesShow this thread -
The MPP program has coincided w/ an increase of murders in Juárez. 151 people were killed in May & 80+ were murdered in the first 17 days of June. There has also been an increase in sex/human trafficking of asylum seekers. I witnessed a woman getting taken by a pimp yesterday.
19 replies 85 retweets 204 likesShow this thread -
That same woman had her Cuban passport taken by border patrol & was sent back to Mexico w/o it due to MPP. With no money & no passport, the Cuban woman, who had the legal right to remain in the US while waiting for asylum, was forced back.
13 replies 91 retweets 266 likesShow this thread -
The senator has made it through with the asylum seekers. They will receive proper care/protection at a shelter (not a detention center) here in the United States.
41 replies 70 retweets 383 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @andrewkimmel
Yup. They’ll receive proper care at a shelter, before disappearing into the us and never showing up at their asylum hearing, because that’s not what they want. They just want the free stuff promised to them by democrats.
5 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @sanfilti @andrewkimmel
By that, do you mean 10%? Because that's the statistic: less than 10% end up having their asylum hearing in absentia. And that's assuming all in absentia cases are people who dont show up at all, which is not the case. https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1107056/download#page=34 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @sanfilti @andrewkimmel
That's a good example of issue of sample selection. Read it carefully. First, not asylum seekers. Second, it's a particular court- "rocket docket"- that issues deportation orders most of time. Wash Post had good breakdown of that claim. I gave you actual stats, not editorializinf
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
What happened to chickenfingers?
-
-
Replying to @andrewkimmel @sanfilti
You can follow his replies down his tweets. He seemed amenable to facts, which was nice. Got a "happy to hear asylum seekers are showing up for court dates." Last thing was something about sanctuary cities that was mostly a non sequitur.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
andrew.kimmel@gmail.com