1/ “Outstanding”, “size unique in the world” (n=6000) DANMASK Randomized Trial of masking vs. nonmasking for C19 prevention rejected “by 3 top journals” appears to be NULLhttps://www.berlingske.dk/videnskab/professor-stort-dansk-maskestudie-afvist-af-tre-top-tidsskrifter …
-
-
3/ “Outstanding study”... “study & its size are unique in the world, & purpose was once & for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of masks in public space provides protection against corona infection"pic.twitter.com/uVPHrnfpzE
Show this thread -
4/ Likely Null? “Can one interpret a controversial research result in the sense that no significant effect of mask use is demonstrated in your study?—“that's a very relevant question you are asking."pic.twitter.com/4a31Eq0vUo
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still not clear if it was peer-reviewed and rejected, or if the journals refused to subject to peer review
-
They should just publish the pdf online All peers can review then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. Just wow. Even the publishing journals are in on this scam. How sad.
-
for a long time they are in...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.