-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think "Purely functional data structures" by Chris Okasaki is a way to go
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scala is a great on-ramp for functional programming. It's a hybrid language and let's you adopt FP bit by bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I liked the Erlang books I read back in the day.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
http://Htdp.org was good to me as a young whippersnapper
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Purely Functional Data Structures" by Okasaki. If you want a shorter sample, https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/cs257/archive/chris-okasaki/redblack99.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scala was my gateway drug, but if your brain is better than mine: direct to Haskell, Purescript or Idris takes you farther down the rabbit hole and, consequently, are more interesting if you want to compare to OO approaches. http://book.realworldhaskell.org/ is aging but IMO good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most languages are incorporating functional features, like lambdas and closures
-
LINQ people: (pushes up sunglasses) "I was into integrated functional features before they were cool"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.