Ohai. Have we talked about the lack of perfect forward secrecy in PGP yet and how PFS would have severely reduced the impact of #efail?
The attack is based on inserting old ciphertext into a new message. With PFS, the key would have changed.
-
-
That means, you can't read an old encrypted message a second time. Right?
-
You actually have to re-encrypt for storage, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.