I am not sure how PFS should help against such unwanted decryption. Please, can you explain?
-
-
-
The attack is based on inserting old ciphertext into a new message. With PFS, the key would have changed.
-
That means, you can't read an old encrypted message a second time. Right?
-
You actually have to re-encrypt for storage, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is impact?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
tja, "perfect" klingt hier immer so... endgültig
-
kann man sagen, der Sicherheits-Kontext hat hier ein Loch und die sichere Zone ist mit so einer re-decryption nicht mehr sicher?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.