Codes of Conduct can never replace good intentions, mutual respect and human decency, but in the right hands, they can be an excellent tool for bullying and abuse.
-
-
No, laws are necessary to regulate involuntary social groups. Not unlike cryptography, they are incredibly expensive and knowledge intensive to write, evaluate, improve, implement and apply, because they are so easy to corrupt, misunderstand, or have unintended consequences.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think you got my posts. The point is, to rely on the laws. And only the laws, not self written CoC, which may have weaknesses ...
-
So you think laws are perfect? You think a group of people coming together should not be able to make their own rules governing them? Innnnteresting theory.
-
I do not think I will discuss which laws I consider good and which not. My personal opinion is to follow all current laws and change
-
the bad ones in democratic ways.
-
But the laws against discrimination, harressment and similar are mostly fine.
-
But the actual point is, that a CoC is the attempt to write your own laws. And laws need to be written such that they do not have loopholes
-
"Let's not write any software, because it might have bugs". You do realize how silly that sounds, right?
-
do not write your own crypto.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.