I'm not oversimplifying by stating that it tries do define realness of transness by whom I screw. And that is such a ridiculous premise.
-
-
Replying to @TerrorizerMir @GenderRebel42 and
Wow. It must be true because people doubt it's true. A masterpiece of circular logic.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andreasdotorg @TerrorizerMir and
Did you know the bible is a holy text and all true, because it says so?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TerrorizerMir @GenderRebel42 and
Nah. I'll just leave this here and go to sleep. Please read it with the same open mind you expect from me. https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TerrorizerMir @GenderRebel42 and
Well, it certainly is relevant to the argument whether or not non-binary sex in humans is a biological thing. Which I think you brought up.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @TerrorizerMir @GenderRebel42 and
Impressive how you ignore the biological reality documented in the linked Nature article.
12:54 AM - 30 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.