Except for the "being aroused by self image of a woman" part. Which kind of seems to be central here.
Well, it certainly is relevant to the argument whether or not non-binary sex in humans is a biological thing. Which I think you brought up.
-
-
Impressive how you ignore the biological reality documented in the linked Nature article.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure you can still apply binary categories to a non-binary phenomenon. You just end up with a couple of bad matches.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Look into the works of Ramachandran. There are aspects of nature *and* nurture.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
But experts say it does Miranda. So I guess there is nothing to discuss. His penis is irrelevant because doctor so and so said so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.