Personally, I am opposed to secure boot. Let people boot what they want but provide means of verifying themselves.
-
-
Replying to @halvarflake
I'd say you could do something like it the right way, but not the way it's done.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hanno @halvarflake
like: no X509 parser, which adds a huge attack surface, much higher code safety standards (probably not C) and user control over key trust
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @hanno @halvarflake
Fundamentally non-attackable x509 parsers should be possible, no?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I have that on my bucket list for later this year.
4:02 AM - 12 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.