Andreas

@andreas_omh

Extremely respected leading international sociology student, left socialist, conscientious objector, autistic. He/him. Writer. 会说,但是我说的很不好。

Bergen, Norway
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2018.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @andreas_omh

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @andreas_omh

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    3. ožu 2019.

    Hierarkiet i psykiatrien i Norge ut fra månedslønn: Overlege: 94 286 Lege: 83 057 Psykolog: 51 540 Spesialsykepleier: 46 730 Sykepleier: 43 160 Fysioterapeut: 40 160 Pasient på uføretrygd: 23 7469 Pasient på sosialhjelp: 7 700 - 12 300

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 31. sij

    When spitting in someone's face we should say: -Why is your face wet? rather than -Are you crying, you baby?

    Poništi
  3. 30. sij

    You can't stand in solidarity with someone who won't stand in solidarity with you.

    Poništi
  4. 30. sij

    If only they would listen to us.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 30. sij

    This is not how you win people over to your side.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 30. sij

    It's really unsettling how ungrateful and hostile these commoners are.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 30. sij

    -Sorry for your experience with psychiatry. I'm a benevolent doctor. Rest assured we're pouring billions of dollars into a hole called Genetic Research and more billions into another hole called Advertising for Drugs. No, you can't leave. Take these pills or we'll electrocute you

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 30. sij

    -Sorry for your experience with capitalism. I'm a good person. I can assure you we're doing a lot of research on debt shifting, registering intangible assets, and strategic transfer pricing. Anything we learn is sure to benefit everyone. Maybe you can find food in the trash.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 29. sij

    1. A child is traumatised every day. 2. Their parent tries to protect them. 3. Parent and child are punished as a result. 4. Now parent is afraid of protecting his child. 5.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 29. sij

    -Your child exhibits some behaviours of abused children. -Yes, I've been saying that school is traumatising for my child. -School is actually good for children, so it must be you. -When children say that school is terrifying, isn't it true? -You like to argue, don't you.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 29. sij

    When you've been abused by the people who are supposed to help, and you lose trust in them, and you express your feelings honestly, it makes them fear and hate you. They punish you, and they punish your children for it. The more you've been abused, the more you're abused.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMET) is very influential in , mental health & cultural, neuroscience & clinical study, & very flawed. I look at recent research on its bias & a highly recommended critical blog post (blog RT'd below). 1/7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 28. sij

    Autism research (and psychiatric research in general) is based on a philosophy of dehumanization and eugenics. Academic researchers as a group have never confronted this. Until they do, whether they approve of it or not, they will be complicit in it.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Autistic people: hey, we're struggling to sleep properly, many of us deal with trauma that need autism specific strategies, and there are various other things that could make our lives easier and happier. Researchers, can you help? Researchers:

    Poništi
  15. 28. sij

    They continue to be prominent psychiatrists and psychologists. What does this tell us about the systems they operate in, and the people who have power in these systems?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 28. sij

    Prominent psychiatrists and psychologists make dehumanising claims about autistic people (and anyone designated the status of psychiatric subject).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 28. sij

    When some "autism researchers" claim that autistic people don't feel empathy, and others disagree, the usually unexamined premise is that the fundamental humanity of autistic people belongs to academic researchers. It's not the property of the autistic people.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 28. sij

    Peak autism warning: No matter what decision is reached, the system which allows for the question to be seriously considered, is a cruel and dangerous system. This is not examined.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 28. sij

    Can the inherent value of human beings and their human rights be scientifically proven? No, of course not. They're not scientific questions. As long as these question are asked, they will be unanswered, and these groups will not be considered fully human.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 28. sij

    Which groups of human beings are unconditionally afforded the right to self-determination and self-definition? Which groups are only conditionally afforded these rights?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 28. sij

    Why does the question present itself? Why is the humanity of a group of people considered a scientific question? What does it say about how the group is seen, when the people we look to for an explanation of them is the group that is trained to be "objective"?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·