"needs more mechanism - have the authors thought of using optogenetics to establish causality?"
Neuroscience reviewer on black hole paper: "I'm not surprised, it looks like I expected it to look, reject".
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is just an image of something already known to exist, i.e. study shows lack of originality and novelty. Moreover, seems risky to assume too much of a conclusion on n = 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fantastic
@andpru! I can see that too from a neuro reviewer. 'We've expected black holes to be black holes for decades so I can't see the novelty in this study'. -
Neuro reviewer : needs more ns to be considered significant. Reject.
-
”Behavioral relevance remains unclear. Reject.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Merely descriptive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Although interesting, not mechanistic. I recommend rejection pending these three expensive and time consumming experiments that won't really add anything to the story."
-
N=1. Pseudoreplicated. Reject
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Too discovery-based, recommend a more specialized journal.
-
This actually did end up in a pretty specialized journal
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43/meta … -
That author list! What fun it must have been to circulate the draft for approval, to a deadline.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“The smoothing kernel is too large. It’s impossible to judge the validity of the image in the current resolution. Reject”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please replicate in a larger sample
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Previously observed in the fly ellipsoid body. Reject" https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14446 … (idea stolen from
@behaviOrganisms)pic.twitter.com/OWRhqNnmBR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where is the negative control?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We don't publish case studies. Reject.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ha! My thoughts exactly ... underwhelming. Exactly how we expected it to look.
-
We found reviewer 2!
-
To clarify, I was personifying the typical neuroscience reviewer. I guess I should have used quotes?
-
Sarcasm can be hard on this here internet!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.