What does "faking" even mean in this context? Are humans "faking" when they use system logs to debug programs?
-
-
-
I would say "faking process X" is to get the same result in a smaller domain as it does, in a "cheap" way. Many situations only require the result and are fine with narrow domains. Other situations do require generalization, robustness or the presence of actual X:ing.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If you fake it in the way humans normally fake something, that might be so. But that does not automatically generalise to DL systems and the way they fake.
-
Faking something in an alien way still implies that there is a sufficient pattern to follow. If fake chess is alien (likely, due to lack of game tree) it implies finding another important structure in setting. Maybe not as good as real chess planning, but surprisingly powerful.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is not surprising if one assumes that linguistic ability is closely related to general intelligence. Grammar induction underlies both linguistic skill and reasoning. See my wiki-book, there's 3 levels: -Linguistics -Ontology -Grammar Induction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zarzuelazen/Books/Reality_Theory:_Ontology_%26_Linguistics …
-
My hypothesis is that these 3 areas are closely related, so I'm not surprised that given a system with rudimentary linguistic ability, there's also some rudimentary ontology and reasoning ability.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thanks, I missed this post because of the uninformative title. Given the relatively few comments, it looks like I'm not the only one.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.