just as military coups do. Not the best argument...
-
-
-
Well, there is no voting at all in a coup scenario.
-
but it's very stable afterwards :)
-
I understand your joke but in fact dictatorships are not stabile at all.
-
they often are. Look at Franco's regime from 1955 to 1970, or to Brezhnev's years in the SU. Stable is not good per se, it's just… stable.
-
Well, there are twists to it. They needed oppression to maintain stability which is a sign of instability.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Different definition of stability too though. Belgium can go for a year without a govt and everything works. That's real stability!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
USA has been a winner takes all oligarchy for several decades, it is not a democracy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bugger stability. The UK is facing an existential crisis. Its backward party & electoral systems need a solid dose of creative destruction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
