A) I know but how efficient when there are fake accounts? B) Many countries have laws against hate speech. Germany well known example.
-
-
Replying to @andersostlund
A) fake accounts are tiny compared to misinformation spread by real ones IMO and b) Germans can sue Germans now, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Obviously we disagree on what constitutes a media and what constitute open air and public space.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
Yes. I think it might be that we come from different legal cultures
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Probably so but I used to be a rock solid libertarian and free speech advocate until a few years ago when I lived through the war in Ukraine
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
I understand that. War can challenge our beliefs. As we witnessed after 9/11 here, for example.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Brexit, Trump, Ukraine, Russia has also convinced me of the importance of public broadcasting companies as a part of civil defence.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andersostlund
For me, I’d leave that up to PRIVATE broadcasting efforts. Public broadcasting works FOR tyrants as well as against them.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
That was always the belief I had. Murdoch helped a lot to change that opinion. Keep in mind Swedish public broadcasting is not gov run.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
For every private media outlet you dislike, another exists you will like. Who runs the “public” broadcast if not gov?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The public broadcasting companies are owned by a foundation ruled by special license fee laws. Complicated but intent to ensure independence
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
