Point is, we must be able to hold somebody responsible for hate speech, defamation etc.
-
-
Replying to @andersostlund
A) you can do that now. And b) you cannot control speech, locally or globally.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
A) I know but how efficient when there are fake accounts? B) Many countries have laws against hate speech. Germany well known example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
A) fake accounts are tiny compared to misinformation spread by real ones IMO and b) Germans can sue Germans now, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Obviously we disagree on what constitutes a media and what constitute open air and public space.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
Yes. I think it might be that we come from different legal cultures
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Probably so but I used to be a rock solid libertarian and free speech advocate until a few years ago when I lived through the war in Ukraine
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
I understand that. War can challenge our beliefs. As we witnessed after 9/11 here, for example.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfcompany
Very much. The stability of a society is way higher on my agenda now. I would embrace a broad coalition here now for example. Never before.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andersostlund
Interesting. In my mind, libertarianism should in fact support that kind of thinking: variety of ideas make society stronger over time
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Very true and that was always my basis for being a libertarian. Freedom of ideas, the right to our body, property etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
